company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Karnataka

COMMISSIONER ,BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMESH KUMAR H

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/589/2021( Date of Filing : 20 Dec 2021 )1. RAMESH KUMAR HAGED 53 YEARS, FLAT NO.609, SARASWATHI B1, BDA JNANABHARATHI RESIDENTIAL ENCLAVE,VALAGERAHLLI, BENGA...

Case Number: 589

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Arif Khan V/S Ghaziabad Development Authority

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar

Respondant Advocate M H Khan

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/2477( Date of Filing : 12 Oct 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Ghaziabad Development AuthorityGha...

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 12-10-2001

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Nishith Nigam

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Bahadur Srivstava

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/400/2022( Date of Filing : 18 May 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/07/2019 in Case No. C/2011/603 of District Lucknow-I)1. Nishith NigamS/o Sri...

Case Number: 400

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Smt.Savitri Yadav

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate Jugendra Singh

Respondant Advocate None

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Smt.Kunti Yadav

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate Jugendra Singh

Respondant Advocate None

Case Number: 62

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2022

Karnataka

COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SATHISH KUMAR T S

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/590/2021( Date of Filing : 20 Dec 2021 )1. SATHISH KUMAR T SAGE 39 YEARS, FLAT NO 607 SARASWATHI B1 BLOCK BDA JNANABHARATHI RESIDENTIAL ENCLAVE VALAGERAHALLI...

Case Number: 590

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2022

Karnataka

The Bangalore Development Authority V/S Smt.S.N.Jayashree

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate J.Prashanth

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1363

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2022

NCDRC

URMILA SINGH & ANR. V/S INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL K. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS NAUTIYAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1870 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/02/2013 in Appeal No. 1921/2008 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY7 RACE COURSE ROADINDOREM.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 1870

|

Date of Filing: 06-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 07-10-2022

Karnataka

Mysuru Urban Development Authority V/S Ramananda Bhat

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ravichandra.S.

Respondant Advocate Mysuru. Rep. by its Commissioner

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 14-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 03-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAJARAM SAROJ

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate ISTEKHAR HASAN

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 232

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2021

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.