Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Smt.Kanta
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2022
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2022
TRIPTA SACHDEV V/S HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
Respondant Advocate MR. ADITYA BHARDWAJ & MR. ISHWAR SINGH SANGWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 108 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 02/12/2021 in Appeal No. 847/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY............
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2022
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2022
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MADAN SINGH
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate ASHISH MATHUR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2022
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PADMA DEVI
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate Ravi Kant Gupta
Respondant Advocate MAHESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2022
Meerut Development Authority V/S Anwar Hussain Quraishi
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V S Bisaria
Respondant Advocate Om Prakash Panday
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/2012/244( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Anwar Hussain Quraishi225 Madh...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2022
The Commissioner, Hospet Urban Development Authority V/S A B Ravindranath
Court Name: Bellary
Appelant Advocate Y Ranganath Rao
Respondant Advocate H Anil Kumar
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2022
Smt. Usha Goel V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Raj & Sarvesh Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate No. Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/767( Date of Filing : 24 Mar 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/02/2003 in Case No. C/76/2000 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Autho...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2003
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2022
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Preeti Nijhawan
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suchita Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Review Application No. RA/4/2022( Date of Filing : 13 Jan 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/259/20191. Preeti NijhawanR/O 3 Haari Niketan West Enclave Pitampura New Delh...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2022
Kanpur Development Authority & Others V/S SASHI
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2022
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Dheeraj Madan
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shuchita Singh
Respondant Advocate No Advocate (OP)
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Review Application No. RA/1/2022( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/258/20191. Dheeraj MadanR/o 3 Hari Niketan West Enclave Pitampura New Delhi 1...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.