company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Smt.Anita

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate Yogender Kumar Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 83

|

Date of Filing: 12-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Krishna Bajpai V/S Kanpur Development Authority

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi

Respondant Advocate A K Rai

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/272( Date of Filing : 12 Feb 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kanpur Development Authoritya.........

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2001

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2022

Haryana

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2022

Orissa

Akshaya Kumar Routray V/S The Cuttack Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. D. Mohapatra & Assoc.

Respondant Advocate Mr. A.K. Samal

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKFirst Appeal No. A/450/2009( Date of Filing : 02 Jun 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2009 in Case No. CD/342/2008 of District Cuttak)1. The Cuttack Development AuthorityRepresented through its Secretary, Aru...

Case Number: 450

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-01-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Pawan Kumar Tiwari V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dilip Kumar Shukla

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/320/2022( Date of Filing : 30 Sep 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/1300/20191. Lucknow Development AuthorityNavin Bhawan Vipin khand Gomti...

Case Number: 320

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Case Number: 317

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2022

Haryana

Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority & Others V/S Surinder Singh Puri

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Faridabad

Appelant Advocate A K Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/216/2021( Date of Filing : 09 Apr 2021 )1. Surinder Singh Puri H. No. 169, Sec-17, FBD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority & OthersSec-12, FBD............Opp....

Case Number: 216

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-01-2023

Maharashtra

Case Number: 110

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2022

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2023

Karnataka

Mysuru Urban Development Authority V/S R. Thippeswamy

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Sri. Ramaraveendra .N

Respondant Advocate Umesh

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/213/2015( Date of Filing : 16 Mar 2015 )1. R. ThippeswamyS/o late Rama...

Case Number: 213

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2022

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUSHIL KUMAR

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/259/2014( Date of Filing : 14 Oct 2014 )1. SUSHIL KUMARHOUSE NO. 81 VILL. ADN POST OFFICE MITRRAON NEW DELHI 110043 ..............

Case Number: 259

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.