Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Pramod Kumar
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2023
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S Smt.Kamlesh
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Sachin Kumar
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Anupam Jindal
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Singla
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/11( Date of Filing : 30 Jan 2023 )InExecution Application No. EA/22/511. Anupam JindalW/o Navneet Jindal R/o House No. 143, Arvind Nagar, NM College Road MansaMansaPunjab...........Appel...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Munish Kumar
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sh. Aneesh Jindal
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/13( Date of Filing : 30 Jan 2023 )InExecution Application No. EA/22/491. Munish KumarS/o Suresh Kumar R/o SD Girls College Street, Near Satsung Bhawan Ward No. 13 MansaMansaPunjab..........
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Abdul Salam
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 406
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2023
KUSHAGRA SINGH V/S GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUAMR & MR. GUDIPATI GAYATRI KASHYAP
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4399 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 17/04/2008 in Appeal No. 249/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYH-169, Sector. Gamma,Greater Noida City Gau...
Case Number: 4399
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2023
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) V/S Uma Shankar Agarwal
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.(Exercising the powers of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class conferred under Section 27(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 now Section 72(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019).Execution Application No.231 of 2019...
Case Number: 231
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2023
SPECIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GWALIOR V/S YOGESH JADON
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2023
Smt. Maya Saxena V/S Moradabad Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Tewari & Abhishek Mishra
Respondant Advocate R. S. Varma
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2002/2485( Date of Filing : 07 Oct 2002 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/09/2002 in Case No. C/452/996 of District Muradabad-II)1. Moradabad Develop...
Case Number: 2002
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2023
GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DAMAN MALHOTRA
Development Authority Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate SURESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.