Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Rajesh Mohan Sarkar V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Balwant Rai
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/315/2022( Date of Filing : 28 Sep 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/2013/3711. Gorakhpur Development AuthorityGorakhpur...........Appellant...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2022
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Jatinder Kaur Bajaj
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Kansal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/23/17( Date of Filing : 14 Feb 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/21/511. Jatinder Kaur BajajW/o Ravinder Pal Singh Bajaj R/o house No. 183 Phulkian Enclave Dist. Patiala...........Appellant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2023
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2023
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority V/S Mohit Nagpal
Development Authority Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Toni
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/495/2021Date of Institution:28.7.2021Date of Decision:27.03.2023Mohit Nagpal aged 31 years son of Sh. Bhupinder Nagpal r/o House No.3233, Ground floor, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh..… Com...
Case Number: 495
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2021
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2023
The Secretary, Bhubaneswar Development Authority V/S The Royal Enclave Apartment Owners Association
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. P.K. Mohapatra & Assoc.
Respondant Advocate M/s. S. Mohanty & Assoc.
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKComplaint Case No. CC/21/2016( Date of Filing : 18 May 2016 )1. The Royal Enclave Apartment Owners AssociationAt- Plot No. 209/2022,209/2033 and 211, Pragati Vihar, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-21, Having its Regi...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Kumari Kirti Babbar
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2023
Bandana Srivastav V/S Unnao Shuklaganj Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Alok Ranjan
Respondant Advocate NAVEEN TIWARI
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2005/1085( Date of Filing : 01 Jul 2005 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Unnao Shuklaganj Development Autho...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2005
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Devi Dayal Rana
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 206
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority And Others V/S Brajesh Bihari Lal
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2023
Kanpur Development Authority V/S Abdul Islam
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate K.C. yadav
Respondant Advocate Shyam Ji Srivastava
Case Number: 692
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2023
Suresh Chand Garg V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate R.D. Kranti
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1199/2019( Date of Filing : 09 Oct 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/09/2019 in Case No. C/148/2015 of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Aut...
Case Number: 1199
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.