Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Tarsem Lal
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate In Peson
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/23/68( Date of Filing : 11 Apr 2023 )InExecution Application No. EA/22/591. Tarsem LalS/o Amar Chand Gupta R/o House No. 249, Santokpura Near Water Tank Tehsil and District Jalandhar..........
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2023
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2023
SURJEET BEDI V/S ESTATE OFFICER (H), GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) & ANR.
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN & MOHIT PRASAD
Respondant Advocate MR. J.K. NAYYAR & MR.G.L. VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1605 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 04/02/2019 in Complaint No. 178/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ESTATE OFFICER (H), GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) & ANR.PUDA BHAWAN, SECTOR-62...
Case Number: 1605
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Darshan Singh
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K. Singla
Respondant Advocate Sh. Aneesh Jindal
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/22/78( Date of Filing : 16 Dec 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/19/351. Darshan SinghS/o Sh Hukam Singh r/o Village Ahmedpur,BudhladaMansaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Punjab Urban Plannin...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2022
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2023
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Mahesh Dhiman
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ranjinder Singh Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/833/2021Date of Institution:29.11.2021Date of Decision:06/04/2023Mahesh Dhiman son of Ram Parkash Dhiman resident of House No.2051-D, Sector 63, CHB, U.T., Chandigarh..… ComplainantV...
Case Number: 833
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2021
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2023
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Raj Kumari
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/698/2021Date of Institution:13/10/2021Date of Decision:05/04/2023Raj Kumari aged about 55 years, daughter of Sh. Ved Parkash Arya, resident of House No.614/1, Sector 41-A, Chandigarh&hellip...
Case Number: 698
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2023
RATNAKAR JAIN V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MDA)
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
Respondant Advocate MR. DEVANSHU AGGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 983 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 30/08/2022 in Complaint No. 114/2020 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MDA)THROUGH ITS SECRETARY EASTERN KUCHARI ROAD, CIVIL LINES, V...
Case Number: 983
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2022
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2023
Delhi Development Authority V/S Surinder Kaur
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: Firozpur
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 200
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2022
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2023
Tripura Urban Planning And Development Authority (TUDA) V/S Shri Anup Roy
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. S. Choudhury
Respondant Advocate Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Ms. N. Chakma Saha
J U D G M E N T [ORAL]Heard Mr. Sampad Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. None appears on behalf of the respondent. Despite repeated adjournments, Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned Government Advocate has not appeared before this Commission. As such, this Commissi...
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2022
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority And Others V/S Smt.Shakuntala Singh
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Amar Singh Mahur
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1086
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2023
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Jogider Kaur
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vinod Kumar
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 157 of 2020 Date of instt.13.03.2020 Date of Decision:29.03.2023Joginder Kaur wife of late Shri Santokh Singh Khillan, resident of house no.96, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Karnal. …….C...
Case Number: 157
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2020
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.