Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY / VICE PRESIDENT V/S SUNDARI
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2023
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS. V/S RADHA THAKUR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHARMA & SWATI BHUSHAN SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1034 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 42/2022 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. RADHA THAKUR...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SH...
Case Number: 1034
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2023
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2023
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GORKHRAM
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate RAMPRAKASH PRAJAPAT
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2023
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS. V/S SUDARSHANA BATRA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHARMA & SWATI BHUSHAN SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1034 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 42/2022 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. RADHA THAKUR...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SH...
Case Number: 1036
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2023
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2023
The Commissioner Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA and another V/S V.Sridhar
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Shilap. K.S
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2023
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SHEHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN & 2 ORS. V/S RAJ KUMAR WADHWA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHARMA & SWATI BHUSHAN SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1034 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 42/2022 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. RADHA THAKUR...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW HARYANA SH...
Case Number: 1035
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2023
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2023
RAM SAGAR YADAV V/S VICE CHAIRMAN, KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK SINGH & MS. PRITI KUMARI GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 09/09/2022 in Complaint No. 27/2018 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. VICE CHAIRMAN, KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMOTI JHEEL, KANPUR2. JOINT SECRETARY ZONE-4, KANPU...
Case Number: 253
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2023
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2023
Patiala Urban Planning & Development Authority V/S Jasvir Kaur
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh J.S Jindu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPATIALA.Consumer Complaint No.:CC/ 25/2020Date of Institution:24.1.2020Date of Decision:26.4.2023Jasvir Kaur wd/o Late Sh.Harpreet Singh S/oSh.Gurvinder Singh r/o V.P.O. Sherpur, Tehsil Dhuri, District Sangrur. ……&helli...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2023
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GOKUL RAM CHOUHAN
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate P.K. POONIA
Respondant Advocate SONU MANAWAT
Case Number: 821
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2023
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY / VICE PRESIDENT V/S PANKAJ GUPTA
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.