Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Shilpa Gupta V/S Agra Development Authority
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Om Prakash Pandey
Respondant Advocate V.K.Srivastava
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/400/2022( Date of Filing : 06 Dec 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/2010/9701. Agra Development AuthorityAgra Through Vice Chairman/ Secret...
Case Number: 400
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2022
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2023
Dr. Vijay Verma V/S Vice Chairman, Haridwar Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Nitin Kumar Garg
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2022
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2023
Janaki Ballav Mohapatra V/S Bhubaneswar Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. D. Mohapatra & Assoc.
Respondant Advocate M/S.B.N.Udgata & Assoc
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKFirst Appeal No. A/756/2014( Date of Filing : 19 Dec 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/332/2007 of District Khordha)1. Bhubaneswar Development AuthorityJawaharlal Neheru Marg, Bhubaneswar............A...
Case Number: 756
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Ajay Kapoor
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Kansal
Respondant Advocate Sh Aneesh Jindal
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/23/11( Date of Filing : 27 Jan 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/21/351. Ajay KapoorS/o Vinod Kapoor R/o Flat No.21 Najjar Road Motia Royal Fame Sector 117 SAS Nagar Mohali...........Appellant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Karamjit Kaur
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Kansal
Respondant Advocate Sh. J.K. Kangar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/23/8( Date of Filing : 27 Jan 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/21/1611. Karamjit KaurD/o Darshan Singh R/o House No. 130 Laxmi Bai Marg Chouri Gali BudhladaMansaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2023
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S SUSHIL CHAND,SATISH CHAND,SUDHIR KUMAR S/O PREM SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2023
THE COMMISSIONER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S S. SHANKREGOWDA
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V. RAVI KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/771/2023( Date of Filing : 26 Apr 2023 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/03/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/37/2022 of District Mysore)1. S. SHANKREGOWDAS/O LATE.N.SIDDEG...
Case Number: 771
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2023
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2023
MANJU GUPTA V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANBIR YADAV
Respondant Advocate MR. ISWAR CHANDRA MAHAPATRA & SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2779 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/05/2012 in Appeal No. 773/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Secretary, MEERUTHU.P............Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 2779
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2023
Himachal Pradesh Urban Development Authority V/S Subhash Chander Sharma
Court Name: Mandi
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vikrant Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. Nishant Ravi
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2023
Himachal Pradesh Urban Development Authority V/S Nalini Sharma
Court Name: Mandi
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vikrant Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. Nishant Ravi
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.