company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Basakhi Ram

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. SK Bansal

Respondant Advocate Sh. Japneet Kapil Kangar

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/22/15( Date of Filing : 11 Feb 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/20/1081. Basakhi RamS/o Surat Ram r/o S.C.F No.29 New Grain Market Dirba Mandi SangrurPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Punjab U...

Case Number: 22

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2022

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Satya Bhama and Another V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rajiv Pandey

Respondant Advocate Mujeeb Effendi & Satish Chandra Srivastava

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/359/2022( Date of Filing : 10 May 2022 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/02/2021 in Case No. cc/236/2016 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Development...

Case Number: 359

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Case Number: 466

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Rajeev Swaroop

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 144

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2023

NCDRC

MERRUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S DR. A.K. AGARWAL

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. K&K LAW ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2232 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 25/03/2019 in Complaint No. 131/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. A.K. AGARWALS/O. SH CP AGARWAL R/O. C-191, ANAND VIHAR DELHI 110092...........Appellant...

Case Number: 2232

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 16-06-2023

Uttar Pradesh

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S INDRAJEET SINGH

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: Agra-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 83

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2023

NCDRC

GAMDUR SINGH BRAR V/S GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN & ZAHID AHMED

Respondant Advocate MR. PARIKSHIT MAHIPAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 15/10/2018 in Complaint No. 469/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH CHAIRMAN PUDA BHAVAN SECTOR 62 MOHALI PUNJAB.........

Case Number: 834

|

Date of Filing: 06-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-06-2023

Rajasthan

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PREMRAJ

Development Authority   Jodhpur Development Authority  

Court Name: Jodhpur

Appelant Advocate DHIRENDRA DACHICH

Respondant Advocate ARUN PARAKH

Case Number: 145

|

Date of Filing: 23-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2023

Punjab

Lakhbir Singh V/S Bathinda Development Authority (BDA)PUDA

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ashish Grover

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1037

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 14-06-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Geeta Sadana V/S Kanpur Development Authority

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Surya Kant Singh

Respondant Advocate Kashi Nath Shukla & S.P. Bajpai, R.K. Mishra

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/770/2019( Date of Filing : 17 Jun 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/04/2019 in Case No. C/500/2011 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Kanpur Developmen...

Case Number: 770

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2019

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.