Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Madhu Bhatia
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 239
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Manoj Kumar Mehrotra
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2023
Lucknow Development Authority V/S Durga Pratap Singh
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amod Rathore
Respondant Advocate Yogesh Tiwari, Anu Tiwari, Piyush Pathak, Shreesh Kumar, Dilip Kumar Shukla, R.K. Gupta
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/20/2023( Date of Filing : 20 Feb 2023 )1. Durga Pratap SinghS/o Late Sri Arjun Singh R/o A-1/108D Vinit Khand Gomti Nagar Lucknow...........Com...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2023
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2023
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY V/S VERSA RANI
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Himanshu Vasan
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2023
Kanpur Development Authority V/S AJAYAB SING
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2023
MAHESH RAM V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YASHARTH KANT, MR. VIKAS SRIVASTAVA & MS. ANAMIKA YADAV
Respondant Advocate ,R. ISAR HUSAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1004 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 01/11/2022 in Complaint No. 71/2019 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIPIN KHAND, GOMTI NAGAR LUCKNOW, U.P.......
Case Number: 1004
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2022
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2023
Pratibha Sisodiya V/S Bareilly Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V P Srivastava
Respondant Advocate Sanjay Saxena
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/1373( Date of Filing : 25 Jun 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Bareilly Development Authoritya......
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2023
Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Jagat Singh Tyagi
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Kumar Tyagi
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 290
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2023
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Mithu Ram
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K. Bansal
Respondant Advocate Sh. Japneet Kapil Kangar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/22/14( Date of Filing : 11 Feb 2022 )InComplaint Case No. CC/20/1071. Mithu RamS/o Surat Ram R/o SCF No. 23, New Grain Market, Dirba MandiMansaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Punjab Urban...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2022
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.