company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Karnataka

Vishalakshi A.M. V/S Mysore Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate G.B. Sharath Gowda

Respondant Advocate A.G.T

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/564/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Feb 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/11/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/64/2014 of District Mysore)1. Mysore Urban Development AuthorityJ.L.B...

Case Number: 564

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2023

NCDRC

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RASHID PARVEZ S/O LATE BADRUDDIN

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAHUL KUMAR JHA & MOHD SAJID

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1697 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 28/10/2022 in Appeal No. A/2003/1357 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RASHID PARVEZ S/O LATE BADRUDDINR/O 6/55, BADA GHALIBPURA, NAI KI MANDI, AGRA, UPAGRAU...

Case Number: 1697

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2023

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority V/S Reena Sharma

Development Authority   Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate VIJAY KUMAR NAGAR

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2023

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Kanpur Development Authority V/S Ram Bali Singh Johri

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate T.H. Naqvi

Respondant Advocate Vishwash Pratap Singh & Piyush Mani Tripathi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2013/82( Date of Filing : 03 Jun 2013 )1. Ram Bali Singh JohriA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kanpur Development AuthorityA............Opp.Pa...

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2023

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority and another V/S B.S.Latha

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate J.M.Aiyanna

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 57

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Muradabad Development Authority V/S Lata Mishra

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S K Shukla

Respondant Advocate S K Sharma, Abhishek Misra

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/548( Date of Filing : 09 Mar 2004 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M. D. A.A...........Appellant(s)Ver...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2004

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Bani Singh & Another V/S Yamuna Express-Way Industrial Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Waseeq Uddin Ahmad & Vikas Kumar Verma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1349/2023( Date of Filing : 11 Aug 2023 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/04/2023 in Case No. CC/533/2018 of District Gautam Buddha Nagar)1. Yamuna E...

Case Number: 1349

|

Date of Filing: 11-08-2023

|

Date of Upload: 08-09-2023

Haryana

Case Number: 112

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2023

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Asha Rani

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Sh. Radhey Shayam

Respondant Advocate Sh. S S Yadav

Case Number: 112

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2023

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUBHASH CHANDER

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 690

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.