company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Mahendra Boran,

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate K.R.N

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/2001/111 Mahendra Boran, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEFOR...

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2001

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Kaushalya Devi V/S Knapur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N.C. Upadhyay

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/129( Date of Filing : 23 Jan 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2000 in Case No. C/421/1996 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Knapur Developmen...

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2001

|

Date of Upload: 21-01-2021

Karnataka

Commission, City Development Authority V/S Abdul Hameed

Development Authority  

Court Name: Hassan

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 49

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2001

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2020

Karnataka

Commissioner, Hassan Urban Development Authority V/S H.R.Krishnappa

Development Authority  

Court Name: Hassan

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 51

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2000

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2020

Uttar Pradesh

Secretary Development Authority V/S Satyawati

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Surendra Narayan Singh

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1997/1167( Date of Filing : 17 Jul 1997 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. SatyawatiVaranasi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. S...

Case Number: 1997

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-1997

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2022

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Dr. Ambalike Hiriyanna

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.consumer case(CC) No. CD/95/1 Dr. Ambalike Hiriyanna ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Author...

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-1995

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Sri. S. Shivashankar

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.consumer case(CC) No. CPA/93/381 Sri. S. Shivashankar ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Autho...

Case Number: 93

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-1993

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

PRAHLADBHAI D. PRAJAPATI V/S URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 94

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-1994

|

Date of Upload: 11-08-2019

Karnataka

THE COMMISSIONER ,URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S M Y SATYANARAYANA RAO

Development Authority  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 232

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-1992

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2019

Karnataka

THE COMMISSIONER , BELLARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT R SWARNALATHA

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bellary

Appelant Advocate SONTHA SUDHAKAR

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 15-01-1991

|

Date of Upload: 16-06-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.