company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Dr.B.Krishna Murthy

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/05/292 Dr.B.Krishna Murthy ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEF...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S T.K.Puttaswamy

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/05/269 T.K.Puttaswamy ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: ...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Cheluvamma H.K.

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/05/298 Cheluvamma H.K. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority (MDA) V/S G. Narasimhala

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/2005/227 G. Narasimhala ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority (MDA) ...........Respondent(s) ...

Case Number: 2005

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The chaiman Bidar Development authority V/S Amareshkumar s/o Late Pandharinath Doijode

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bidar

Appelant Advocate Govindrao Kumtekar

Respondant Advocate RK Gannure

Case Number: 149

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2003

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2021

Karnataka

Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Puttamma

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate M.R.S

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/2005/138 Puttamma ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(...

Case Number: 2005

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chhattisgarh

Bilaspur Development Authority V/S Mohanlal Bajaj

Development Authority   Bajaj  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 10-03-2004

|

Date of Upload: 14-06-2023

Chhattisgarh

Raipur Development Authority V/S Deep Rathore

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri Vijay Rathore

Respondant Advocate Shri Kiran Tiwari

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 13-05-2002

|

Date of Upload: 05-06-2023

Chhattisgarh

Kawarlal Arora V/S Raipur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Smt. Kiran Tiwari

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2003

|

Date of Upload: 22-06-2023

Chhattisgarh

Mohan Lal Sahu V/S Chif Executive officer, Raipur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Smt. Kiran Tiwari

Respondant Advocate Shri K.M. Jain

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2003

|

Date of Upload: 22-06-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.