company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

RAM KRISHAN & ANR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate ANIL HOODE

Respondant Advocate -

Date of Filing: 18 Jan 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/180/2006(Against the Order dated 10/07/2005 in Appeal No. 386/2005 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORSPANCHKULA - - .......

Case Number: 180

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

RAJESH KUMAR SINGHANIA V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 365

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2007

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2018

NCDRC

SARDARA SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUDA NOW GMADA & ANR

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. C.K. SUCHARITA

Respondant Advocate -

Date of Filing: 25 Feb 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/896/2008(Against the Order dated 11/07/2007 in Appeal No. 1217/2001 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUDA NOW GMADA ...

Case Number: 896

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Bhachau Area Development Authority Mandal V/S Kalakruti Engineers, Prop. Dipesh J. Thacker

Development Authority  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate A.J. Thacker

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2020

NCDRC

CAPT. RAJ SINGH V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HUDA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate JURIPERITUS

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 27 May 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2318/2008(Against the Order dated 01/04/2008 in Appeal No. 136/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HUDAThrough its Estate Offi...

Case Number: 2318

|

Date of Filing: 27-05-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S SHRI BRIJ KISHORE TYAGI

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate KHAITAN & KHAITAN

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 14 Aug 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. No. CC/108/2008 1. SHRI BRIJ KISHORE TYAGIR/o 844/1,Soti GanjMeerutUttar Pradesh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR Sector-6,Gautambudh...

Case Number: 108

|

Date of Filing: 14-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

GOPENDRA KUMAR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 02 Jun 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIRevision Petition(RP) No. RP/2392/2008(Against the Order dated 16/01/2008 in Appeal No. 106/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS Near Navyug Market,...

Case Number: 2392

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Shanthala

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Chikkanna

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/113 Shanthala ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development AuthorityThe State of Karnataka ...........Respo...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

LAKHWINDER KUMAR V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. HARVINDER KAUR

Respondant Advocate -

Date of Filing: 11 Apr 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI.Revision Petition(RP) No. RP/1476/2008(Against the Order dated 05/12/2007 in Appeal No. 264/2005 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYOPPOSITE TEHSI...

Case Number: 1476

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

PIO and Commissioner, Mercara Urban Development Authority V/S Y.M.Kaushik

Development Authority  

Court Name: Kodagu

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate B.S.Rudraprasanna

THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/42 Y.M.Kaushik ...........Appellant(s)Vs.PIO and Commissioner, Mercara Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. A.S.Hemala...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 24-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.