Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
MRS. RAJ PATHAK V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate JURIS CONSULTUS
Respondant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1053 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 04/11/2005 in Appeal No. 8/2005 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYRESIDENT OF 382-383 HOUSING BOARD COLONY SIRSA ROAD HISAR .......
Case Number: 1053
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2010
BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S NRUSINGHA CHARAN DAS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 12 Jul 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3576/2009(Against the Order dated 08/07/2009 in Appeal No. 282/2002 of the State Commission Orissa) 1. NRUSINGHA CHARAN DASH.I.G. I-36, B.D.a. Housing Complex, Kapilap...
Case Number: 3576
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2010
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MR VINOD KUMAR
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1630
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2003
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
ADITYA BHARGAVA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 11 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/346/2010(Against the Order dated 30/11/2009 in Appeal No. 13/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Its Secretary, 6, Jagd...
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2010
KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S AJIT KUMAR
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 08 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/338/2010(Against the Order dated 09/11/2009 in Appeal No. 3168/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. AJIT KUMARR/o House No. 147/459, U-Block, Nirala NagarKan...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2010
ALOK SINGH V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 20 Nov 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4321/2009(Against the Order dated 11/06/2009 in Appeal No. 933/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Its Vice Chairmana...
Case Number: 4321
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2009
SHAKTI HOTEL PVT. LTD. V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.
Development Authority Hotel Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMEET SIINGH
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 18 Nov 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4267/2009(Against the Order dated 14/07/2009 in Appeal No. 1370/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.New Okh...
Case Number: 4267
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2009
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH.S.K.KATARIYA
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate NA
Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. No. FA/106/2005(Against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SH.S.K.KATARIYARESIDENT OF HD-1/284, SECTOR-1 JANKIPURAN LUCKNOW ...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2005
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2009
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH.O.P.SHARMA
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate NA
Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. No. FA/107/2005(Against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in Complaint No. 1516/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SH.O.P.SHARMARESIDENT OF H-1/283, SECTOR 1, JANKI PURAM LUCKNOW U...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2005
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2009
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MAN MOHAN AGARWAL
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate NA
Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. No. FA/108/2005(Against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MAN MOHAN AGARWALRESIDENT OF HD-1/52, SECTOR-I JANKI PURAM LUCKNOW...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2005
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2009
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.