Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ARUNABH CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 30 Jan 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/258/2006(Against the Order dated 09/02/2005 in Appeal No. 92/2005 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSECTOR -6 PANCHKULA HARYANA ....
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2010
Development Authority Bangalore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANKUR S. KULKARNI
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 15 Feb 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/754/2010(Against the Order dated 30/06/2009 in Appeal No. 1369/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka) 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNo. 7, T Chowdayya Road, Kumar...
Case Number: 754
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2010
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PAWAN SHARMA & U.M. TRIPATHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/02/2008 in Appeal No. 1512/2002 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SHANTI DEVI & ORSResident Bhattu Kalan, HissarHaryana2. RAM KISHANResident of Bhattu Kalan, Hi...
Case Number: 2224
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2010
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2017
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TARUN DIWAN & S.C. MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 344 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 19/09/1997 in Complaint No. 39/1995 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. COL RN KALRA (RETD.)225, Uphar (SPL) Eldeco, Rae Bareli RoadLucknow - 226 025Uttar Pradesh .....
Case Number: 344
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH U. UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 07 Sep 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3350/2009(Against the Order dated 17/03/2009 in Appeal No. 2678/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThe Secretary, Allahbad D...
Case Number: 3350
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2010
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate D. Prabhakar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.Execution Application(EA) No. EA/09/155 Mahendra Boran, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Aut...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 09 Sep 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3428/2009(Against the Order dated 06/02/2009 in Appeal No. 724/2007 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan. INA New Delhi .............
Case Number: 3428
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 10-03-2010
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019APPEAL NO. 1415 of 2008 1. Haryana Urban Development Authoritythrough its Sub divisional Engineer, , Hisar. , . ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Smt. ...
Case Number: 1415
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate P.K.AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 27 Apr 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1040/2006(Against the Order dated 25/11/2005 in Appeal No. 1225/2002 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN I.N.A NEW DELHI NEW DELHI...
Case Number: 1040
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 10-03-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.