Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 09 Apr 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1378/2010(Against the Order dated 19/01/2010 in Appeal No. 1927/2004 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SURESH KATARIAR/o. House No. 333, Sector 16, Nai BastiGurgaonH...
Case Number: 1378
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2010
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate G. JOSHI
Respondant Advocate R. UPADHYAY
Date of Filing: 01 Oct 1997 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. No. OP/224/1997 1. HINDUSTAN FERTILISERS CORPN. LTD.REG OFF AT -MADHUBAN 55, NEHRU PLACE NEW DELHI ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS BHAWAN , VIKA...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-1997
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2010
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV BAHADUR SRIVASTAVA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1488 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/12/2008 in Appeal No. 959/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN SINHAS/o. Late Raja Ram Sinha R/o. 44, Rajendra Nagar Lucknow U.P ..........
Case Number: 1488
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2010
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 23 Mar 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1182/2010(Against the Order dated 18/12/2009 in Appeal No. 2365/2006 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANRThrough its Chief Adm...
Case Number: 1182
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2010
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. TANIA SINGH & GAURI GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 29 Mar 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1223/2010(Against the Order dated 22/01/2009 in Appeal No. 3267/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SHASHI SEHGALR/o. House No. B-19, F1, Ram PuriGhaziabad ...
Case Number: 1223
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2010
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA
Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 789 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/08/2009 in Appeal No. 1714/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its SecretaryMeerutUttar Pradesh ...........Petitione...
Case Number: 789
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2010
Development Authority Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. C. GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 20 Oct 2008 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. No. CC/137/2008 1. M. I. BUILDERS (PVT.) LTD.New Janpath Complex 28/14 9-A Ashok Marg Hazratganj LucknowUttar Pradesh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELO...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2010
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRASHANT KR. SHARMA & J.N. MAHATO
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 16 Nov 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3486/2006(Against the Order dated 05/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1759/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYESRATE PFFOCE . SORSA HA...
Case Number: 3486
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2010
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNESHWAR GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 16 Nov 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4161/2009(Against the Order dated 05/03/2008 in Appeal No. 415/2007 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Its Secretary Improvemen...
Case Number: 4161
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. H.S. BHATI
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 25 Feb 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/923/2010(Against the Order dated 20/11/2009 in Appeal No. 1032/2006 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. S.K. KANSALResident of 2682, Sector - 3, FaridabadFaridabadHary...
Case Number: 923
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.