Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3570 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Smt Phoolmati Devi V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N C Upadhayay
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1997/1924( Date of Filing : 04 May 1997 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gorakhpur Development Authority a...........Appell...
Case Number: 1997
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-1997
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2022
Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S K.S. Jayappa
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate K.P.M
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/407 K.S. Jayappa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. ...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Rajendra Kumar V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Raj
Respondant Advocate V D Verma
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/458(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Meerut Development Authority A...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Rajendra KumarA.........
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2004
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2015
Mandya Urban Development Authority V/S Bhagyalakshmamma
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate Sri.M.R.A.Prakash
Respondant Advocate H.Basavaiah
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYANo.2083/1, Subhash Nagar, 1st Cross, Mandya-571401consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/108 Bhagyalakshmamma ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mandya Urban Development Authority ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manoh...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bidar Urban Development Authority Naubad V/S Kashinath s/o Veerabhadrappa Poste
Court Name: Bidar
Appelant Advocate Jayanthi Patil
Respondant Advocate RK Gannure
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2021
Bidar Urban Development Authority Naoubad V/S Dhanraj s/o Kahsinath Poste
Court Name: Bidar
Appelant Advocate Jai raj K Bukka
Respondant Advocate RK Gannure
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2021
Bidar Urban Development Authority Naoubad V/S Kirthiraj s/o Kashinath Posteaged
Court Name: Bidar
Appelant Advocate Jayanthi Patil
Respondant Advocate RK Gannure
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2021
Ashok Kumar Gupta V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Raj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/328(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Meerut Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ashok Kumar GuptaA......
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2004
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2015
Banagalore development authority V/S Jayathi P L
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate Harikrishna holla
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/1666 Jayathi P L ...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Banagalore development authority V/S Kamala murthy P L
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate Harikrishna holla
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/1667 Kamala murthy P L ...........Appell...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.