company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Kerala

T.V.Chakrapani V/S Kottayam Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.Laila

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. A/09/392(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/03/2009 in Case No. Cc 83/08 of District Kottayam) 1. Kottayam Development AuthorityKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. T.V.ChakrapaniKerala ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE :HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESID...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

LT. COL. ASHWANI KUMAR VOHRA V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 157 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/03/2010 in Complaint No. 2/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, Meerut Development AuthorityMeerutUttar...

Case Number: 157

|

Date of Filing: 25-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2010

NCDRC

HARINDER PAL SINGH BHATIA V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA & MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2207 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 16/11/2009 in Appeal No. 1112/1993 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its SecretaryMeerutUttar Pradesh ...........Petition...

Case Number: 2207

|

Date of Filing: 09-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 21-07-2010

NCDRC

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SURYAKANT TIWARI

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1717 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 22/04/2009 in Appeal No. 15/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SURYAKANT TIWARIS/o. Ramdeen Tiwari, R/o. 11/41/E/91, Sita Nagar, Firozabad RoadAgra - 6Ut...

Case Number: 1717

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2010

NCDRC

SURINDER KAUR KOHLI, W/O LATE AMARJEET SINGH KOHLI & ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate M/S. KIMMI BRARA MARWAHA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 04/07/2008 in Complaint No. 69/2000 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, INANew Delhi ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SURINDER KAUR KO...

Case Number: 105

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2010

NCDRC

ARUNA BHANDARI & ORS. V/S INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL K. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2022 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/02/2010 in Appeal No. 86/2008 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) 1. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough CEO, 7, Race Course RoadIndoreMadhya Pradesh ...........

Case Number: 2022

|

Date of Filing: 19-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2010

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SURENDER KUMAR

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV BHATNAGAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2027 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/01/2010 in Appeal No. 3493/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SURENDER KUMARR/o. House No. 88, Des Raj ColonyPanipatHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 2027

|

Date of Filing: 19-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2010

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPINING

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUN K. MALHOTRA & RAJAN KHANNA

Respondant Advocate MS. SHWATA MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 78 OF 1999 1. M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPININGMILLS P. LTD. OFFICE AT B - 86 GREATER KAILASH PART - I NEW DELHI - 110048 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAUTHORITY HUDA THROUGH ...

Case Number: 78

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-1999

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2010

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH MUKUL SRIVASTAVA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/413/2007( Date of Filing : 13 Mar 2007 )1. SH MUKUL SRIVASTAVAHOUSE NO. 233 1ST FLOOR SBI COLONY PASCHIM VIHAR, NEW DELHI 110063.............

Case Number: 413

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2018

NCDRC

RAM PRAKASH SHARMA V/S AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHEER KULSHRESHTHA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/04/2010 in Complaint No. 3/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.Vice Chairman, Agra Development AuthorityAgraUttar Pradesh .....

Case Number: 142

|

Date of Filing: 13-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-06-2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.