company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

L.S. SHARMA V/S RAI BAREILLY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY VISEN

Respondant Advocate M/S. R.R. & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2817 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 17/03/2006 in Appeal No. 1374/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAI BAREILLY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS , CHAIRMAN RAI BAREILLY - -...........Pet...

Case Number: 2817

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2010

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HINDUSTAN FERTILIZERS CORPORATION LTD.

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. G. JOSHI & MR. S. SAXENA

Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 170 OF 1994 1. HINDUSTAN FERTILIZERS CORPORATION LTD. - ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY- ...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...

Case Number: 170

|

Date of Filing: 25-03-1994

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2010

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S S.G.M. RIZVI

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. R.S. PRABHU & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1326 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 02/03/2010 in Appeal No. 744/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. S.G.M. RIZVIResident of Mansarovar Apartments, Sector - 61NoidaUttar Pradesh ...........P...

Case Number: 1326

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2010

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANSHUL AGRAWAL

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. R.S. PRABHU & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1326 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 02/03/2010 in Appeal No. 744/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. S.G.M. RIZVIResident of Mansarovar Apartments, Sector - 61NoidaUttar Pradesh ...........P...

Case Number: 1327

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2010

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHOK KUMAR GOEL

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINOD PANT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2822 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 01/07/2010 in Appeal No. 380/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. ASHOK KUMAR GOEL5-A/3-A, Ansari Road, Darya GanjNew DelhiDelhi ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. D...

Case Number: 2822

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2010

NCDRC

AMRIT PAL KAUR V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHNA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate MR. MARPINDER SINGH (AUTH REP.)

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3774 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 25/08/2006 in Appeal No. 898/2006 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.THROUGH IRS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR , PUDA ,...

Case Number: 3774

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2006

|

Date of Upload: 11-08-2010

Punjab

Munish Kumar, Addl. Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Raj Kaur

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramandeep Singh, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh.Ajitinder Pal Singh Chahal,O.P.s.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRCT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001Execution Application(EA) No. EA/10/32 Raj Kaur ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Munish Kumar, Addl. Chief Administrat...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

GAURAV GARG & ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1475 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 19/01/2010 in Appeal No. 706/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThe Vice-Chairman, Delhi Development Authority, D Block, 2nd Floor, Se...

Case Number: 1475

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2010

Chandigarh

Smt. Naraini Devi V/S Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. No. RBT/FA/323/2009FIRST APPEAL NO. FA of 2009InO.A. NO.FA/1330/2007 1. Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development AuthoritySector...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN, KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MANGAL PRASAD GUPTA

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. LAV KUMAR AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 02/04/2009 in Appeal No. 469/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MANGAL PRASAD GUPTAS/o Late Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, R/o House No. 69/08, Danakhori Kanpur...

Case Number: 2150

|

Date of Filing: 19-06-2009

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.