company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S CHAMAN LAL CHITKARA

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 187 OF 20101. CHAMAN LAL CHITKARAS/o Late Sh. Ram Lal Chitkara, R/o No. 1468, Sector - 14Faridabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough The CEO, Noida, Sector ...

Case Number: 187

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 27-10-2010

NCDRC

VIJAY KUMAR JOSHI & ANR. V/S SHIMLA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. HARSH KUMAR PURI

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL NAG

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 34 OF 1997(Against the Order dated null in Complaint No. of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. SHIMLA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VIJAY KUMAR JOSHI & ANR.-...........Responde...

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-1997

|

Date of Upload: 03-11-2010

NCDRC

BHAGWAN V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. UPASANA NATH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3234 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 09/04/2010 in Appeal No. 522/2004 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Administrator, SCO 63-64, Sector 17-C...

Case Number: 3234

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2010

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. O.P.KHADARIA

Respondant Advocate MR. SURYANARAYANA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 30/08/2006 in Appeal No. 1876/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMISOLAR PAINTS E-174, GREATER KAILASH -I, NEW DELHI - ...........Petition...

Case Number: 2933

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2006

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2010

NCDRC

VISHNU DATT DIMRI V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH U. UPADHYAY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2553 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/04/2010 in Appeal No. 30/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, Vikash PathGhaziabadUttar Pradesh .....

Case Number: 2553

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 28-09-2010

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Railway   Indian Railway  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate A.K.TEWARI

Respondant Advocate NA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 79 OF 20041. INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2004

|

Date of Upload: 27-09-2010

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH JAGDEEP BALI

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/833/2009( Date of Filing : 19 Nov 2009 )1. SH JAGDEEP BALIHOUSE NO. 843 SECTOR-17A GURGAON HARYAN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI D...

Case Number: 833

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2018

NCDRC

NOIDA MANAGEMENT SYSTAM PVT. LTD. & ANR. V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MR. AVINASH KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1710 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 20/04/2010 in Appeal No. 20/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMain Administrative Block, Sector 6, NoidaGautam...

Case Number: 1710

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 23-09-2010

NCDRC

RAJENARA NARAYAN DAS & ORS V/S BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S. MISHRA & J.R. DAS

Respondant Advocate MR. AJAY KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2148 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 28/01/2008 in Appeal No. 181/2006 of the State Commission Bihar) 1. BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANRAKAS SHOVA BUILDING, SACHIVALAYA MARG, BHUBANESWAR,KHURDAO...

Case Number: 2148

|

Date of Filing: 14-05-2008

|

Date of Upload: 23-09-2010

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MOHAN LAL

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DHARAM RAJ OHLAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2545 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/05/2010 in Appeal No. 134/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. MOHAN LALR/o. 134/22, Shiv Nagar, Peer Wali GaliPanipatHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. D...

Case Number: 2545

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.