Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Punjab Urban Development Authority/Bathinda Development Authority V/S Tej Kaur
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh. Amandeep Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ajitinder Pal Singh Chahal,O.P.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/267 1. Tej KaurW/o Balwant Singh Lamberdar, resident of village Balluana, Tehsil and...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MUKUL SRIVASTAVA
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2594 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 13/07/2010 in Appeal No. 500/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MUKUL SRIVASTAVAR/o. 233, (1st Floor), S.B.I. Colony, Paschim ViharNew Delhi - 110063Delhi..........
Case Number: 2594
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2010
Managing Director, Mineral Area Development Authority V/S Ramesh Chandra Sinha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s Sachin Kumar and A.K. Sinha
Respondant Advocate Mr. Apresh Kumar Singh
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2023
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S VIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate PRADEEP GAUR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4027 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 23/05/2006 in Appeal No. 2295/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. VIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA1571. SECTOR., 5. R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)V...
Case Number: 4027
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2010
SUKHINDER PAL KAUR JASWAL V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. C.K. SUCHARITA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2833 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/03/2010 in Appeal No. 1126/2007 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Administrator, PUDA Bhawa...
Case Number: 2833
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S AMRIT LAL BANSAL & ORS.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL MITTAL
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1377 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 11/12/2009 in Appeal No. 49/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AMRIT LAL BANSAL & ORS.Plot No. 458, Sector-7Ambala CityHaryana2. THE AMBALA URBAN ESTATE SOCIET...
Case Number: 1377
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2010
LT. COL. K. C. KATOCH V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2599 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 09/04/2010 in Appeal No. 249/2009 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(Through its Chief Executive Off...
Case Number: 2599
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2010
HARWINDER SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. PABBI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2272 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 21/12/2005 in Appeal No. 1110/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYESTATE OFFICER ,PUDA COMPLEX BATIHINDA -...........Petition...
Case Number: 2272
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2010
SURINDER KAUR V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. PABBI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2272 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 21/12/2005 in Appeal No. 1110/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYESTATE OFFICER ,PUDA COMPLEX BATIHINDA -...........Petition...
Case Number: 2273
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2010
ANIL KUMAR V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4092 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/10/2010 in Appeal No. 53/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMain Administrative Block, Sector 6, NoidaGuatam Budh ...
Case Number: 4092
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.