Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R. R. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4699 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/09/2010 in Appeal No. 309/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHRI. SHIV SHANKARR/o. C/o. Shri Rama Nand, H. No. G-47/2, 2nd Floor, Room No. 27, Main Market, C...
Case Number: 4699
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. MITTER & MITTER CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4076 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 18/02/2009 in Appeal No. 1181/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. S.S. AHMED702, Akash Appts, Agripada Mumbai-400011...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MUMBAI M...
Case Number: 4076
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKTI K. PATTANAIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4696 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/10/2010 in Appeal No. 458/2008 of the State Commission Orissa)1. CUTTACK DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYArunodaya Bhawan, Link RoadCuttack - 12Orissa...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 4696
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JINENDRA JAIN
Respondant Advocate MS. MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 106 OF 20011. M/S. PADIA TIMBER CO.WH 5 FURNITURE BLOCKKIRITI NAGAR NEW DELHI ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADANNEW DELHI NA...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2001
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3252 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 11/05/2010 in Appeal No. 110/2010 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. ATUL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVAResident of Flat No. E3, Sai Appartment Sai Nagar Devender Nagar Roa...
Case Number: 3252
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2011
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 621 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 18/10/2005 in Appeal No. 507/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN I.N.A. NEW DELHI NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 621
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2006
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2011
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3068 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 14/02/2005 in Appeal No. 57/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. K.C.SHARMAS/O. SHARMA PRESENT ADDRESS VIJAYA BANK RAILWAY ROAD BULANDSHAGAR UP. ...........
Case Number: 3068
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2011
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 788 of 2003 1. Pankaj Guptason of Sh. Lal Chand Gupta R/o House No. 1897 Sector-34/D Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For t...
Case Number: 788
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.