Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH, ADV.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 680 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/12/2006 in Appeal No. 1488/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SHAKUNTALA DEVIW/O. SH. HARI CHAND, HOUSE NO.300, VIDYA NIKETAN ROAD, MODEL TOWN ROHTAK ...
Case Number: 680
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shailesh Ch Tiwary
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/1165(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Gorakhpur Development Authority a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Alok Kumar B...
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. PANKAJ NANHERA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 872 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 06/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1706/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RISHI MOHAN KAMRAS/o. Sh. Manohar Lal Kamra, Adopted S/o. Sh. Buta Ram Kamra, R/o. H. No. 445, ...
Case Number: 872
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2011
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1151 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1063/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MUKESH KUMAR GUPTAC/o. Mukesh Enterprises, 2/39, Ansari Road, DaryaganjNew DelhiDelhi......
Case Number: 1151
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2011
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2568 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 30/03/2007 in Appeal No. 1611/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. GROUP CAPTAIN HARJAS SINGH BAINSGROUO CAPTAIN HARJAS SINNGH BAINS BSSI PATHANAN DISTT, FATEHGARH...
Case Number: 2568
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JISHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2199 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/02/2010 in Appeal No. 264/2004 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Estate Officer, S.C.O. No. 41, Opposite...
Case Number: 2199
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1072 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/02/2007 in Appeal No. 1218/2001 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYDEVELOPMENT AUTORITY PUDA COMPLEX CHANDIGARH ROA...
Case Number: 1072
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SEERAJ BAGGA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1073 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1568/2007 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62...
Case Number: 1073
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SEERAJ BAGGA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1074 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/02/2007 in Appeal No. 1016/2001 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER PUDA BHAWAN SECTOR 62...
Case Number: 1074
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2011
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Neeta Kunda
Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 107 OF 19991. JAGDISH KUMARHOUSE NO. 310, SECTOR -8 PANCHKULA HARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VICE CHAIRMAN, M.D.A. MEERUT U.P............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-1999
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.