Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA
Respondant Advocate MR. VINEET SAHAI BISARIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1275 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/11/2010 in Appeal No. 516/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its SectretaryMeerutUttar Pradesh...........Petitione...
Case Number: 1275
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HARSH KUMAR PURI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 349 OF 1997(Against the Order dated 24/12/1996 in Appeal No. 62/1994 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-1997
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2011
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2004(Against the Order dated 01/06/2004 in Complaint No. 3/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UNIVERSAL MOTORS (P) LTD.16/64, CIVIL LINES KANPUR UP...........Appellant(s)Versus1. KANPUR DEVELOPM...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2004
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2011
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ashok gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.D.Nayyar,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/22 1. Archana Mittal wife of Sh.Prem Mittalr/o House no.87,green avenue,opposite Ros...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM GODARA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/01/2011 in Appeal No. 287/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AVINASH CHANDERThrough its GPA Smt. Reena Rai, Wife of Sh. Vijay Nagpal, Resident of 27, Vijay ...
Case Number: 1176
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2011
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM GODARA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1178 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 2769/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJINDER SINGHR/O VILLAGE PATI LAYANA TEHSIL SAMALKHAPANIPATHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 1178
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2011
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA, ADV.
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2241 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 05/09/2007 in Appeal No. 311/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. WG.CDR.S...
Case Number: 2241
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2011
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 691 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 22/08/2006 in Complaint No. 197/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MS SUJATA DASC/O S...
Case Number: 691
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.S. SALAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 560 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/09/2010 in Appeal No. 442/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. SHAM SINGHR/o. V.P.O. NattLudhianaPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & ...
Case Number: 560
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ASHUTOSH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1338 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1737/1994 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. JAGANATH PRASAD GUPTAKADAMB. VIHAR - MATURA ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. SECRETARY ...
Case Number: 1338
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.