company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Kerala

The Marine Product,Export Development Authority V/S C V Mathew

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate George Cherian Karipparambil

Respondant Advocate Joseph Markos

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. 757/2004(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. C V MathewKocheril House,Kumbalanghi,Kochi BEFORE:HONARABLE MR. SRI.M.V.VISWANATHAN PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: OR...

Case Number: 757

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2004

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MADHURIMA GUPTA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2672 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 15/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1119/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MADHURIMA GUPTAC/O. SURESH KUMAR , GUPAR 103. MUKHERJEE , NAGAR , DR, MUKHERHEE NAGAR , DELHI ...

Case Number: 2672

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2011

Jharkhand

Mineral Are a Development Authority V/S Rajendra Prasad Chaurasia

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr M. Chaurasia

Respondant Advocate Mr. Bhawash Kumar

Case Number: 298

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2022

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV SRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 74 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 25/08/2010 in Appeal No. 1802/1996 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMAKM-1, New Kavi NagarGhaziabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 06-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2011

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S MAHINDER SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3834 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 06/11/2009 in Appeal No. 2244/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MAHINDER SINGHResident of H. No. 55, Jagan Nath ViharPanipatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Ver...

Case Number: 3834

|

Date of Filing: 13-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2011

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. ASHA & ANR

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate N. SAHOO

Respondant Advocate NA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 412 OF 2004(Against the Order dated 24/08/2004 in Complaint No. 82/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SMT. ASHA & ANRB-82, NANAK PURA NEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTH...

Case Number: 412

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2004

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2011

Madhya Pradesh

GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANIL KU. CHHAPARIYA

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 11-05-2017

NCDRC

SATYAWATI JAIN V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/01/2011 in Appeal No. 857/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, INANew DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. SATYAWA...

Case Number: 1134

|

Date of Filing: 07-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2011

NCDRC

ROURKELA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SAMI ASHRAF

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. FIROZ ALAM

Respondant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKAR RAO

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4137 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 19/08/2010 in Appeal No. 230/2004 of the State Commission Orissa)1. SAMI ASHRAFR/o. Nala Road, Post Rourkela-I, P.S. PlantsiteSundargarhOrissa...........Petitioner(...

Case Number: 4137

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2011

Uttar Pradesh

Geater Noida Industrila Development Authority V/S Kamla Gupta

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S K Verma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/2011/114(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kamla Gupta a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Alok Kumar Bose PRESIDING ME...

Case Number: 2011

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.