Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. JYOTI & MR. M.P. SHORAWALA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3656 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1063/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMerrutMerrutUttar Pradesh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MU...
Case Number: 3656
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIS PRERITUS
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL PRUTHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1036 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 13/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1354/2003 of the State Commission Punjab)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA -.....
Case Number: 1036
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2012
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 781
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADEEP MISRA
Respondant Advocate DR. SANDEEP SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2655 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/02/2010 in Appeal No. 3170/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, Moti JheelKanpur NagarUttar Prade...
Case Number: 2655
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2011
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri C V Sheelvant
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/869/20111. Smt N Dhanalakshmi#150,1st stg,2nd phase,Behind Aishwarya corner,Gayatripuram,Mysore-570019 BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERDate of Filing : 05.05.2011Date of Order : 30.11.2011BEFORE THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SESHADRIPU...
Case Number: 869
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIREN DASAN
Respondant Advocate MRS. C.K. SUCHARITA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 458 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/06/2005 in Complaint No. 96/2001 of the State Commission Punjab)1. SARUPA RANIHIRA MEHAL, NABHA DISTRICT - PATIALA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT PL...
Case Number: 458
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2006
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2011
Development Authority Bangalore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GIRISH ANANTHAMURTHY
Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. KULKARNI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 430 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 02/09/2010 in Complaint No. 226/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. QASI MIR SHAH ABUL HASAN & ORS.R/O ,NO,4,RANOJI RAO ROAD BASVANAGUDI BANGALORE BANGALORE -560004...
Case Number: 430
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. KULKARNI
Respondant Advocate MR. TRIDEEP PAIS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2005(Against the Order dated null in Complaint No. of the State Commission Kerala)1. BANGLORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VARGHEE GEROGE P.-...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nb...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2011
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ashok Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.N.P.Singh,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/342 1. Govind Ram son of Sh.Lal chand r/o House no 115,Kamla nehru colony,Bathinda ....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ashok Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.N.P.Singh,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/344 1. Gobind Ramson of Lal chand r/o H.No15,Kamla Nehru colony Bathinda ..............
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.