Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
JAGDISH LAL ARORA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJAY JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 93 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 31/10/2007 in Appeal No. 763/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. JAGDISH LA...
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2012
The Deputy Secrtary Bangalore Development Authority V/S Sri M.K. Puttaswamy Aged About 60 Years
Development Authority Bangalore Development Authority
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri S. Nagesh
Respondant Advocate .
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2022
RAMESH KUMAR NATANI V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK KUMAR & PURUSHOTTAM S.T.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 225-226 OF 2012 IN RP/3075-3076/20111. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. RAMESH KUMAR NATANI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA, ...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2012
BHANU PRAKASH DADHICH V/S JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MADHURIMA TATIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 623 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/08/2011 in Appeal No. 107/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough itsJodhpurRajasthan...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. BHANU...
Case Number: 623
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2012
SUNIT KUMARI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL HOODA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3777 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 12/12/2005 in Appeal No. 1048/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, GURGAON -...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 3777
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2012
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MALA SHARMA
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3443 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/03/2008 in Appeal No. 2001/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MALA SHARMAR/o 6547/9,Gali No.2 Dev NagarNew DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 3443
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2012
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BHAGAT SINGH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 643 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 13/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1356/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BHAGAT SINGH-2. BHAGAT SINGHC/O. JAI TAWAN TEA STALL COURT COMPLEX BHIWANI TEHSILR/O. VILLAGE J...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2012
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S THE MUNDI CO - OPERATIVE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 155 OF 20021. THE MUNDI CO - OPERATIVEHOUSING BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.S.C.O. NO. 27 IST FLOORPHASE IST S.A.S. NAGAR MOHALI THROUGH ITS SECRETAR2. --...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DE...
Case Number: 155
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2002
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2012
HARYANA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S K.K. MIDDHA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 387 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 30/05/2011 in Complaint No. 13/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. K.K. MIDDHA601, E/13 Society No. 79, SEctor-20, Panchkula...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HARYANA DE...
Case Number: 387
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2012
BHAVRI BAI V/S BHOPAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT SWAROOP SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4694 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 17/09/2010 in Appeal No. 1957/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. BHOPAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYPragati Bhawan, Press Complex, M.P. NagarBhopalMadhya Prade...
Case Number: 4694
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.