company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

SHRI VIMAL KAPOOR AND ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. KAPOOR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 511 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 23/05/2006 in Complaint No. 75/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SHRI VIMAL KAPOOR A...

Case Number: 511

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 10-05-2012

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GROUP CAPTAIN HARJAS SINGH BAINS

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2012 IN RP/2568/20071. GROUP CAPTAIN HARJAS SINGH BAINS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRESIDIN...

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2012

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJAY NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate

Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 139 OF 19971. SANJAY NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONP- BLOCK ,SANJAY NAGAR GHAZIABAD U.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHE VICE CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD U.P............O...

Case Number: 139

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-1997

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2012

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RADHA VERMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1474 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMA16 Sri Anandpuram DharampurBalrampur - 271201...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 1474

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2012

NCDRC

BAIKUNTHA NATH PATTNAIK V/S BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. S.S. MISHRA & AASOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. R.M. PATNAIK

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3172 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 17/05/2011 in Appeal No. 92/2009 of the State Commission Orissa)1. BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAkshay Sobha Building, Sachivalaya Marg,BhubaneswarKhurdaOrissa....

Case Number: 3172

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2012

NCDRC

YOGENDER PAL TYAGI V/S GHAZAIBAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MS. SUSHMA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1544 OF 2001(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZAIBAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YOGENDER PAL TYAGI-...........Responden...

Case Number: 1544

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2001

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2012

NCDRC

YOGENDER PAL TYAGI V/S GHAZAIBAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR SHARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1544 OF 2001(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZAIBAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. YOGENDER PAL TYAGI-...........Responden...

Case Number: 2516

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2002

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2012

NCDRC

AJAI VERMA V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVI BHUSHAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3937 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 09/02/2010 in Appeal No. 2092/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice- Chairman, MotijheelKanpurU.P...........Pet...

Case Number: 3937

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2012

NCDRC

JUGAL KISHORE AGARWAL V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA

Respondant Advocate MR. AMIT WADHWA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2908 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/05/2011 in Appeal No. 222/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its SecretaryMerrut U.P............Petitioner(s)Versu...

Case Number: 2908

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2012

NCDRC

ASHOK KUMAR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND GARG

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3935 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2091/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice President, ghazibad Development Authorit...

Case Number: 3935

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.