Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S KAVITA GUPTA
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...
Case Number: 963
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2012
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SANGEETA GUPTA
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...
Case Number: 964
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2012
M/S. ANAND ESTATE PRIVATE LTD. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 04/07/2006 in Complaint No. 279/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. ANAND ESTATE ...
Case Number: 442
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2012
M/S. EXPRESS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority Properties
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 443 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 04/07/2006 in Complaint No. 16/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. EXPRESS PROPER...
Case Number: 443
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2012
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 736 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 26/09/2007 in Appeal No. 1639/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA83 -OF KYDGANJ ALLAHABAD ALLAHABAD...........Petitioner(s)Versus...
Case Number: 736
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2012
THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER V/S DARSHINDER PAL KAUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BHUPINDAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 128 OF 20121. DARSHINDER PAL KAUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J....
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2012
SALEEM AHMED V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2012 IN RP/211/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SALEEM AHMED...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR....
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2012
VIJAY BALA KAPOOR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate MR. VIBHU TIWARI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1549 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/01/2012 in Appeal No. 576/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan,INA,New DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. VIJAY B...
Case Number: 1549
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2012
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S M/s Daulat Ram Hotel (P) Ltd.
Development Authority Hotel Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.Neeraj Pal Sharma, Adv. for the complainant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sikander Bakshi, Adv. for the OPs
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 54 of 2006 1. M/s Daulat Ram Hotel (P) Ltd.1644, Urban Estate-II, Hisar through its Managing Director Sh. Ashwani Kumar ...........
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S Dr. VEDPRAKASH GOYAL
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 324
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.