company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SANDEEP JAIN

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 953

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S AJAY LAHOTI

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 954

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SUSHILA SHARMA

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 955

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S VISHANK PATEL

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 956

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SHAILENDRA PALIWAL

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 957

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S ANSHU JAIN

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 958

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SUBHASH SOMANI

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 959

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S ATUL TIWARI

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 960

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S ASHOK BANSAL

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 961

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SANTOSH BHATI

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 962

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.