company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

MUNNEY KHAN V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. A. HASSAN & MR. ABRAR AHMAD

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2123 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/07/2011 in Appeal No. 687/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE- CHAIRMEN,MOTIJHEEL, KANPUR-UTTAR PRADESH......

Case Number: 2123

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S SMT. JYOTI SHARMA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. CHANDRA & CHANDRA ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3309 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/07/2011 in Appeal No. 864/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SMT. JYOTI SHARMAD/o Sh Ramesh Kumar Sharma, Now Mrs JyotiSethi, R/o H.No-37, Rajpur Road,Gwali...

Case Number: 3309

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2012

NCDRC

JAGDISH CHANDER LUTHRA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. Y.R. GROVER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 335 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/03/2009 in Complaint No. 166/1998 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, INANew Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. JAGDISH CHANDER ...

Case Number: 335

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2012

NCDRC

ESTATE OFFICER , HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S RAJ KUMAR GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. CHANDRA & CHANDRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3322 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/03/2009 in Appeal No. 2248/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJ KUMAR GUPTAS/o Sh Khubi Ram, R/o B-42 Chander Nagar, Tha GhaziabadU.P...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 3322

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 646

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PANKAJ YADAV

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 948

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANOOP UDHWARESHE

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 949

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANJAY DUBE

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 950

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RITESH MISHRA

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 951

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

NCDRC

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SARANJEET KAUR

Development Authority   Indore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 646 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1037/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SUSHMA JHAWAR & 25 ORS.W/o Shri Damodar Jhwar , 43/1 Chhipa BakkalIndoreM.P2. Pankaj Yad...

Case Number: 952

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.