company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S S.K. KATARIYA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. UDIT KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MR. VINEET SRIVASTAVA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/02/2011 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. S.K. KATARIYAS/O LATE SHRI J.N. KATARIYA, R/O HD-1/284, SECTOR-1,JANKIPURAM,LUCKNOW.UP.........

Case Number: 238

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S O.P. SHARMA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. UDIT KUMAR CHATURVEDI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/02/2011 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. S.K. KATARIYAS/O LATE SHRI J.N. KATARIYA, R/O HD-1/284, SECTOR-1,JANKIPURAM,LUCKNOW.UP.........

Case Number: 251

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S M.M. AGRAWAL (DEAD)

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. UDIT KUMAR & MS. CHANCHAL SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/02/2011 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. S.K. KATARIYAS/O LATE SHRI J.N. KATARIYA, R/O HD-1/284, SECTOR-1,JANKIPURAM,LUCKNOW.UP.........

Case Number: 254

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

NCDRC

S.K. KATARIYA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/02/2011 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. S.K. KATARIYAS/O LATE SHRI J.N. KATARIYA, R/O HD-1/284, SECTOR-1,JANKIPURAM,LUCKNOW.UP.........

Case Number: 347

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

NCDRC

O.P. SHARMA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. VINEET SRIVASTAVA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/02/2011 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. S.K. KATARIYAS/O LATE SHRI J.N. KATARIYA, R/O HD-1/284, SECTOR-1,JANKIPURAM,LUCKNOW.UP.........

Case Number: 348

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

NCDRC

MANMOHAN AGGARWAL V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. VINEET SRIVASTAVA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/02/2011 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. S.K. KATARIYAS/O LATE SHRI J.N. KATARIYA, R/O HD-1/284, SECTOR-1,JANKIPURAM,LUCKNOW.UP.........

Case Number: 349

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DIMPAL YADAV

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP PHOGAT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1251 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/09/2011 in Appeal No. 882/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DIMPAL YADAVW/o Shri Ajit Singh, R/o H.No-115,Sector- 5HansiHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 1251

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2012

NCDRC

ACHHAR SINGH DOGRA V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. S.B. LAL SAXENA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1553 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/11/2010 in Appeal No. 2147/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVice Chairman Vikas Path, Hapur RoadGhaziabadUP.............

Case Number: 1553

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2012

NCDRC

BANIBRATA TRIPATHY V/S BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIBASHISH MISRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 345 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/12/2009 in Appeal No. 810/2009 of the State Commission Orissa)1. BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAkash Sobha Building, Sachivalaya Marg, BhubaneswarKhurdaOdisha....

Case Number: 345

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S INDRA GUPTA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MOTISH KR. SINGH

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3522 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/06/2007 in Appeal No. 2231/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. INDRA GUPTAHOUSE NO. B-1153, SECTOR-17B, IFFCCO COLONY GURGAON...........Petitioner(s)Versu...

Case Number: 3522

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2007

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.