company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

VIJAY KUMAR V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. (NOW GLADA)

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1672 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 30/09/2008 in Appeal No. 271/2001 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. (NOW GLADA)Through Its Chief Administra...

Case Number: 1672

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2012

NCDRC

HARI RAM V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. (NOW GLADA)

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1672 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 30/09/2008 in Appeal No. 271/2001 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. (NOW GLADA)Through Its Chief Administra...

Case Number: 1673

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2012

NCDRC

DABAR INDIA LTD. V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3098 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 02/12/2008 in Appeal No. 2694/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman Vikaspath Ghaziabad ..............

Case Number: 3098

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2012

Maharashtra

Mr. Madhukar Omkar Tarhale V/S The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/07/06(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. 585/96 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development AuthorityGirha Nirman Bhawan, Bandra (E), Mu...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JONES MASIH BHATTI

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MRS. C.K. SUCHARITA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1958 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/04/2011 in Appeal No. 354/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. JONES MASIH BHATTIH.NO-1035, SECTOR-69, SAS NAGAR, MOHALI-160062PUNJAB-...........Petitioner(s)V...

Case Number: 1958

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2012

NCDRC

RAMESH KUMAR NATANI V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK KUMAR & PURUSHOTTAM S.T.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3075-3076 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 20/01/2011 in Appeal No. 808&804/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Jaipur Development Authority, Jawaharlal Nehru Ma...

Case Number: 3075

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2012

NCDRC

BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIS PRERITUS

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL PRUTHI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2012 IN RP/1036/20071. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...

Case Number: 309

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-08-2012

NCDRC

M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 451 OF 2012 IN FA/35/19991. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAI...

Case Number: 451

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2012

NCDRC

M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR RAVINDRA BANA

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 452 OF 2012 IN FA/35/19991. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAI...

Case Number: 452

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2012

NCDRC

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ORS. V/S PROF. J. BHARDWAJ

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SAURAV KHURANA & ASHOK KHURANA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 382 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1001/2006 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PROF. J. BHARDWAJS/o late Sh B.N Sharma, R/o 2010/1,C Block Ranjit Avenue AmritsarPunjab...........

Case Number: 382

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.