Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SUBODH KUMAR BAHETI
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. VIKAS JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 501 OF 2012 IN RP/2335/20121. SUBODH KUMAR BAHETI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...
Case Number: 501
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2012
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ARUNA KHANDELWAL
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YATEENDRA SINGH JAFA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4088 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 27/07/2011 in Appeal No. 786/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ARUNA KHANDELWALC/o Shri R.K Khadelwal IPS (Retd) B-4 Triveni Apartments,Sheikh SaraiNew Delhi -1...
Case Number: 4088
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2012
SUSHILA GUPTA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV
Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/11/2010 in Appeal No. 451/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Main Administrative Building, Sector - 6...
Case Number: 4554
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2012
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAVI NARAIN BAJPAI
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH CHADHA
Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1613 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/03/2007 in Appeal No. 1655/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAVI NARAIN BAJPAI1/241, VIRAM KHAND -1, GOMATI NAGARLUCKNOWUTTAR PRADESH...........Peti...
Case Number: 1613
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2012
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S O.P. DWIVEDI AND ORS
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARMANAND SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2012 IN RP/2475/20071. O.P. DWIVEDI AND ORS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHO...
Case Number: 250
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2012
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Beant Singh
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Gurpreet Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/1791. Beant Singh son of Sh.Gulzari lal r/o MIG-65,Model town,Phase I,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bathinda Development Autho...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHARDA KAURA
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. KAMINI SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. O.P. SHARDA & MS. MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 417 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/09/2006 in Complaint No. 214/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHARDA KAURAHOUSE NO 55 SECTOR 9 PUNCHKULA HARYANA PUNCHKULA HARYANA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DELHI ...
Case Number: 417
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2012
KARUNA SHANKAR SHUKLA V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1292/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice -Chairman, MotijheelKanpurU.P...........Pet...
Case Number: 2124
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2012
GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANAND KU. CHHAPARIYA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2015
THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BOUTIQUE INTERNATIONAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIJAY MANGLA & N.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Complaint No. 36/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BOUTIQUE INTERNATIONALPlot No. 553, Sector-37, Pace city-II,having Registered office at 202, Padma ...
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.