company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4135 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2039/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Kanpur Development Authority, MothijheelKanpur NagarU...

Case Number: 4135

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-09-2012

NCDRC

KRISHANA DEVI V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.P. SHORAWALA

Respondant Advocate MR. KUNWAR MOHD. RAFI & MR. H.K. DIWAKAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2531 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/03/2012 in Appeal No. 122/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY_MerrutU.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. KRISHANA DEVIW/o S...

Case Number: 2531

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-09-2012

NCDRC

ASHOK KUMAR SOOD V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RANBIR YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2267 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/05/2012 in Appeal No. 130/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its SecreataryMeerutU.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus...

Case Number: 2267

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. DAULAT RAM SAINI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH MITTRA

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3819 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 18/10/2006 in Appeal No. 151/2001 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DR. DAULAT RAM SAINIR/O D. P. S. I. CAMPUS, SECTOR XII, R. K. PURAM, NEW DELHI...........Pet...

Case Number: 3819

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S GANDHI KARYAKARTA SEHAKARI SAMITI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI MIDHA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3858 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2882/2003 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GANDHI KARYAKARTA SEHAKARI SAMITI197 Green Park, Panipat, through its PresidentPanipatHaryana....

Case Number: 3858

|

Date of Filing: 28-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S SUMESH MITTAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 919 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 329/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUMESH MITTALS/o Shri Satya Pal, R/o H.No513 Gali No-5 Gurbax ColonyPatialaPunjab...........Peti...

Case Number: 919

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KANPUR V/S SATI PRASAD

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BAJPAI AND CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 215 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/03/2007 in Complaint No. 35/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SATI PRASADS/O GOPI NATH R/O 616, BLOCK-D, SECTOR - 17, KONARK ENCLAVE VASUNDRA, GHAZIABAD............

Case Number: 215

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

NCDRC

IQTIDAR AHMAD V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3728 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1922/SC/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW ( U. ...

Case Number: 3728

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

NCDRC

ALTAF AHMED V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...

Case Number: 3744

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

NCDRC

MAHBOOB ALI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...

Case Number: 3745

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.