company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S O.P. DWIVEDI AND ORS

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PARMANAND SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2475 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/10/2006 in Appeal No. 127/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. O.P. DWIVEDI AND ORSS/O SHRI R.S. DWIVEDI, RESIDENT OF 3/125, VISHESH KAHAND GOMTI NAGER ...

Case Number: 2475

|

Date of Filing: 19-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 27-09-2012

Chandigarh

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority V/S Lt. Col. Lakhbir Singh Bedi (Retd.)

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 386 of 2011 1. Lt. Col. Lakhbir Singh Bedi (Retd.)Advocate, F-84, Army Flats, Sector 4, M.D.C. Panchkula-134114. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Greater Mohali Area Development AuthoritySector 62, SAS Nagar (Mohali), throu...

Case Number: 386

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

KHALID HASHMI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3312 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/08/2012 in Appeal No. 494/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYD Block,2nd Floor, Self Fiancing Scheme Vikas Sadan, INANew Delhi- 110...

Case Number: 3312

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-09-2012

NCDRC

MONIKA RANI V/S BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. JENA & SIDDHARTH PANDA

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 10/11/2007 in Appeal No. 851/2007 of the State Commission Orissa)1. BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AKAS SHOVA BUILDING, SACHIVALAYA MARG, BHUBANESWAR, DISTRICT KH...

Case Number: 966

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 21-09-2012

Punjab

Bathinda Development authority V/S Angrej Kaur

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/12/361. Angrej Kaurd/o Jhakhar singh r/o v.Jalalana,w/o darshan singh,H.No 1293-A,Model town,Phase I,Bathinda...........Appellant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

KANTA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3218 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/02/2012 in Appeal No. 149/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Theough its Estate Officer,Sector-14GurgaonHaryana............

Case Number: 3218

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-09-2012

NCDRC

GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAM SINGH NEGI & ORS.

Development Authority   Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDER KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 459 OF 20021. RAM SINGH NEGI & ORS.S/o. Late Heera Singh Negi, R/o. T-2/1, Police Colony Andruj Ganj,New Delhi ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 169 CHITVAN E...

Case Number: 459

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2002

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2012

NCDRC

THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHRI AMRIK SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR.NEERAJ PAL SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/01/2011 in Complaint No. 02/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SHRI AMRIK SINGHr/o: village & post office : Pali, Tehisil: Narnaud Hisar Haryana...........Appella...

Case Number: 150

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2012

NCDRC

ALOKE GUPTA & 2 ORS. V/S KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KUMAR GHOSH & BARUN PRASAD

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 539 OF 2012 IN RP/1232/20121. KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. ALOKE GUPTA & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN,...

Case Number: 539

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2012

NCDRC

MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S CHAMAN LAL JAIN

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJESH MAHNA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 269 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/12/2011 in Appeal No. 924/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. CHAMAN LAL JAINR/o 89, ThatherwadaMerrutU.P............Petitioner(s)Versus1. MEERUT DEVELO...

Case Number: 269

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-09-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.