Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2674 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMA16 Sri Anandpurdhan DharampurBalrampur - 271201U.P...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 2674
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2815 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/03/2012 in Appeal No. 203/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJAY KUMAR JANGRAS/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jangra R/o Village Dhana LadanpurBhiwaniHaryana........
Case Number: 2815
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2012
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/02/2009 in Complaint No. 1168/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Joint Secretary, MeerutUttar Pradesh...........Appell...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2012
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/02/2009 in Complaint No. 1639/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Joint Secretary, Meerut,Uttar Pradesh...........Appel...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2012
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 153 OF 2012 IN RP/4135/20111. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMB...
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2012
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 353
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2016
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 15/09/2006 in Complaint No. 190/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, RL VIKAS SADAN, INA NEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3764
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3765
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3766
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.