company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

DR. T.R. LAKHANPAL V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4139 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 296/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Offi...

Case Number: 4139

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-12-2012

NCDRC

JATINDER VAIDYA V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate MS. SONAM ANAND & MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4141 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 336/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive-Cum-...

Case Number: 4141

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-12-2012

NCDRC

RAM BABU MEHROTRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1905 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/08/2011 in Appeal No. 888/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, 6Jagdish Chand Bose Marg,LucknowU.P.....

Case Number: 1905

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2012

NCDRC

BULANDSHAHR KHURJA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANIL KUMAR

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. R.R. & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. AVIJIT BHUSHAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3222 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 03/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1388/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. ANIL KUMARR/o. Dharam Niwas, Civil LinesBulandshaharUttar Pradesh...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 3222

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 20-11-2012

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHIV NARAIN GUPTA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY PAUL

Respondant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1656 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/05/2011 in Appeal No. 393/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHIV NARAIN GUPTAS/o Late Sh Ram Chander Gupta B-161 Serctor- 26Noida - 201301U.P...........Petit...

Case Number: 1656

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RANI DEVI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. G. I . SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2942 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/06/2012 in Appeal No. 2242/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RANI DEVIW/o Shri Laxmi Chand Gupta, R/o House No. 884, Sector 7, Ambala CityHaryana.............

Case Number: 2942

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2012

NCDRC

BHAGWAN DIN V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 742 OF 2012 IN RP/1768/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAGWAN DIN...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...

Case Number: 742

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2012

NCDRC

SARVESH CHANDRA CHATURVEDI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 743 OF 2012 IN RP/1769/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SARVESH CHANDRA CHATURVEDI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESI...

Case Number: 743

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUKHBIR SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANOJ KUMAR SOOD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1075/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUKHBIR SINGHS/o Shri Ami Chand, R/o of House no- 1922, Sector- 8FaridabadHaryana...........Pe...

Case Number: 2920

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2012

NCDRC

SUDARSHAN KUMAR V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RANBIR YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2921 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1172/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary MerrutU.P...........Petitioner(s)Versu...

Case Number: 2921

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-11-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.