company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

GURDEESH KUMAR DODA V/S MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 598 OF 2012 IN RP/3758/20061. MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GURDEESH KUMAR DODA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING ...

Case Number: 598

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11-2012

NCDRC

MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 5 ORS. V/S SUJATA R. SULAKHE & 3 ORS.

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3130 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1549/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SUJATA R. SULAKHE & 3 ORS.R/o 133, Ojas Rom No.1, Dr. M.B. Raut Road, Shivaji Park,Mumbai-4...

Case Number: 3130

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2012

NCDRC

KRISHANPAL SINGH V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AMEET SIINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3512 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/05/2010 in Appeal No. 329/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSector-2,NoidaGhaziabadU.P...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 3512

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER V/S SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 786 OF 2012 IN RP/3764/20111. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Res...

Case Number: 786

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER V/S SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 787 OF 2012 IN RP/3765/20111. SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Responden...

Case Number: 787

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

NARESH KUMAR RAWAT V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4274 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 6/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice-Chairman, Mitijheel KANPURU.P...........Petiti...

Case Number: 4274

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2012

NCDRC

UMAKANT AGGARWAL V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4263 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/08/2012 in Appeal No. 964/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough the Commissioner, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Indira Nagar Ci...

Case Number: 4263

|

Date of Filing: 05-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

RAKESH GUPTA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 784 OF 2012 IN RP/524/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAKESH GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...

Case Number: 784

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-11-2012

NCDRC

COMMISSIONER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S S.J. NARAYANA SWAMY

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGION OF LAWYERS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3624 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/09/2010 in Appeal No. 3812/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. S.J. NARAYANA SWAMYS/o Sri Bharanaih R/at Door No-1669 9th Cross,Ashokapuram Chamaraja Mohal...

Case Number: 3624

|

Date of Filing: 24-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2012

NCDRC

GURBANT SINGH & ANR. V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4138 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 293/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrouh its Executive Officer-Cum...

Case Number: 4138

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-12-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.