Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 598 OF 2012 IN RP/3758/20061. MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GURDEESH KUMAR DODA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING ...
Case Number: 598
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3130 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1549/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SUJATA R. SULAKHE & 3 ORS.R/o 133, Ojas Rom No.1, Dr. M.B. Raut Road, Shivaji Park,Mumbai-4...
Case Number: 3130
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2012
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMEET SIINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3512 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/05/2010 in Appeal No. 329/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSector-2,NoidaGhaziabadU.P...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 3512
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 786 OF 2012 IN RP/3764/20111. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Res...
Case Number: 786
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 787 OF 2012 IN RP/3765/20111. SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Responden...
Case Number: 787
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2012
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4274 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 6/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice-Chairman, Mitijheel KANPURU.P...........Petiti...
Case Number: 4274
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2012
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4263 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/08/2012 in Appeal No. 964/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough the Commissioner, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Indira Nagar Ci...
Case Number: 4263
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 784 OF 2012 IN RP/524/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAKESH GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...
Case Number: 784
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2012
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGION OF LAWYERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3624 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/09/2010 in Appeal No. 3812/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. S.J. NARAYANA SWAMYS/o Sri Bharanaih R/at Door No-1669 9th Cross,Ashokapuram Chamaraja Mohal...
Case Number: 3624
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4138 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 293/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrouh its Executive Officer-Cum...
Case Number: 4138
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.