company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

MAHENDER KUMAR MAHESHWARI V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2013 IN RP/3499/20111. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MAHENDER KUMAR MAHESHWARI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHA SHANKAR

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDER RAO & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 15/09/2010 in Complaint No. 108/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ASHA SHANKARW/O :SH.PRATAP SHANKAR R/O:R-734,NEW RAJINDER NAGAR NEW DELHI -110060...........Appellant...

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 14-01-2013

NCDRC

D.K. SHARMA & ANR. V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate MR. ANAND PRAKASH & BABITA SETH (R-1 & 2)

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2023 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/03/2012 in Appeal No. 24/2009 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNigam ViharShimla - 171002H.P.......

Case Number: 2023

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2013

NCDRC

MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S CHAMAN LAL JAIN

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJESH MAHNA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 935 OF 2012 IN RP/269/20121. CHAMAN LAL JAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHO...

Case Number: 935

|

Date of Filing: 07-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2013

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KANPUR V/S SATI PRASAD

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BAJPAI AND CO.

Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2012 IN FA/215/20071. SATI PRASAD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KANPUR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BL...

Case Number: 700

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-12-2012

NCDRC

BRIJESH KUMAR SINGH V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4547 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/03/2010 in Appeal No. 804/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, MotijheelKANPURU.P...........Petit...

Case Number: 4547

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2012

NCDRC

NEERAJ KUMAR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/10/2012 in Complaint No. 68/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (H-I), VIKAS SADAN, I.N.A, NEW DELHI...........Appell...

Case Number: 726

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2012

Madhya Pradesh

GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUNITA KUMARI

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 542

|

Date of Filing: 24-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAJKUMAR BATRA

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 543

|

Date of Filing: 24-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2016

NCDRC

VIBHA SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1831/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator,Sector-6PanchkulaHary...

Case Number: 2334

|

Date of Filing: 19-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.