Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2013 IN RP/3499/20111. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MAHENDER KUMAR MAHESHWARI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDER RAO & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 15/09/2010 in Complaint No. 108/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ASHA SHANKARW/O :SH.PRATAP SHANKAR R/O:R-734,NEW RAJINDER NAGAR NEW DELHI -110060...........Appellant...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. ANAND PRAKASH & BABITA SETH (R-1 & 2)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2023 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/03/2012 in Appeal No. 24/2009 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNigam ViharShimla - 171002H.P.......
Case Number: 2023
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2013
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJESH MAHNA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 935 OF 2012 IN RP/269/20121. CHAMAN LAL JAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHO...
Case Number: 935
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2013
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BAJPAI AND CO.
Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2012 IN FA/215/20071. SATI PRASAD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KANPUR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BL...
Case Number: 700
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2012
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4547 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/03/2010 in Appeal No. 804/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, MotijheelKANPURU.P...........Petit...
Case Number: 4547
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2012
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/10/2012 in Complaint No. 68/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (H-I), VIKAS SADAN, I.N.A, NEW DELHI...........Appell...
Case Number: 726
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2012
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 542
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 543
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1831/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator,Sector-6PanchkulaHary...
Case Number: 2334
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.