company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

YAMUNA EXPRESSWAY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S UMA MITTAL

Development Authority   Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. B.M. MITTAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 765 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Complaint No. 216/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. UMA MITTALW/O. SHRI BRIJ MOHAN MITTAL, R/O. 2404, SECTOR-16,FARIDABAD-121002HARYANA...........Appell...

Case Number: 765

|

Date of Filing: 14-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2013

NCDRC

TILAK RAJ MAHAJAN V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3628 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/04/2012 in Appeal No. 51/2009 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(Through its CHief Executive Offi...

Case Number: 3628

|

Date of Filing: 24-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2013

NCDRC

SATISH KAUL V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3629 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/04/2012 in Appeal No. 82/2009 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(Through its CHief Executive Offi...

Case Number: 3629

|

Date of Filing: 24-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2013

NCDRC

THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHRI AMRIK SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR.NEERAJ PAL SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2013 IN FA/150/20111. SHRI AMRIK SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2013

NCDRC

SMT. POOJA GUPTA V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 387 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/06/2012 in Appeal No. 59/2011 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN(THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER-CUM-SECRETARY), NIG...

Case Number: 387

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2013

NCDRC

RAM NIWAS GUPTA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. PRAKASH ARYA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4006 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 18/07/2007 in Appeal No. 387/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAM NIW...

Case Number: 4006

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2013

NCDRC

RAJESH TIWARI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate M/S. R.K. PATRA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4466 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/07/2012 in Appeal No. 366/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAJESH TIWARIS/...

Case Number: 4466

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S SUMITRA SUDAN

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1643 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/09/2011 in Appeal No. 897/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUMITRA SUDANR/o Shop No-250,Sector-7,MarketFaridabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HA...

Case Number: 1643

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2013

NCDRC

MANOJ ARAN V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SIDDHARTH SENGAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2847 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/05/2012 in Appeal No. 3263/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary Civil LinesMeerutU.P...........Petitio...

Case Number: 2847

|

Date of Filing: 03-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2013

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SARLA DEVI

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 291 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 04/05/2012 in Appeal No. 2253/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SARLA DEVIW/O SUNDER LAL, R/O 54, DAROGABAGH, CIVIL ,CIVIL LINES,UNNAOU.P = 209801..........

Case Number: 291

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.