Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. RAMESH K. HARITASH & MR. NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2752 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/06/2012 in Appeal No. 420/2010 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. AMAR NATH VASHISHTHAG-204 Rail Vihar,Sector-4 MDC PanchkulaHaryana...........Petitione...
Case Number: 2908
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. RAMESH K. HARITASH & MR. NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2752 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/06/2012 in Appeal No. 420/2010 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. AMAR NATH VASHISHTHAG-204 Rail Vihar,Sector-4 MDC PanchkulaHaryana...........Petitione...
Case Number: 2909
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2013
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 703
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH KUMAR YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 591 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/04/2012 in Appeal No. 2084/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1046/20131. BABU RAMS/O SH LEEL RAM, R/O VILLAGE & POST OFFICE DHANDO, NEAR KANINAMAHEND...
Case Number: 591
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2013
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4548 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1757/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, Motijheel KANPURU.P...........Pet...
Case Number: 4548
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Complaint No. 46/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.SECTOR-6, PANCHKULAHARYANA2. THE ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA ...
Case Number: 141
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2002 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/03/2012 in Appeal No. 651/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. D.S. SAGIR/o Kothi No-98,Phase-VII, SAS nagar MohaliPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DELHI ...
Case Number: 2002
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3971 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1722/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. LAXMI NARAINThrough GPA Ved Prakash , S/o Shri Chander Pal, R/o H.No-842/18, Naharpur Road,Shi...
Case Number: 3971
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 15/10/2012 in Appeal No. 880/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/971/2013,IA/972/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VIKAS SADAN , INANEW ...
Case Number: 543
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2013
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJESH MAHNA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 269 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/12/2011 in Appeal No. 924/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. CHAMAN LAL JAINR/o 89, ThatherwadaMerrutU.P............Petitioner(s)Versus1. MEERUT DEVELO...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.