company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

ALOKE GUPTA & 2 ORS. V/S KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KUMAR GHOSH & BARUN PRASAD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2012 IN RP/1232/20121. KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. ALOKE GUPTA & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA...

Case Number: 838

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 03-05-2013

NCDRC

YOGENDRA NATH BHATT V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MRS. BINA BHATT

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2007 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 2025/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, Moti Jheel KanpurU.P...........Pe...

Case Number: 2007

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2013

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BRIJ LAL SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.R. ANAND

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 212 OF 2013 IN RP/4136/20111. BRIJ LAL SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBE...

Case Number: 212

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-05-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHRENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1644 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/09/2011 in Appeal No. 899/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.Village & PO Chappra Tehsil ,Nuhan GurgaonHaryana2. DushyantVillage & P...

Case Number: 1644

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2013

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KANPUR V/S SATI PRASAD

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BAJPAI AND CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 215 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/03/2007 in Complaint No. 35/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SATI PRASADS/O GOPI NATH R/O 616, BLOCK-D, SECTOR - 17, KONARK ENCLAVE VASUNDRA, GHAZIABAD............

Case Number: 215

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2007

|

Date of Upload: 18-04-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHRENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2013 IN RP/1644/20121. HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. C...

Case Number: 194

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2013

NCDRC

JITENDER KAUR V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4009 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/03/2012 in Appeal No. 2600/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its CEO, Main Adminstrative Block, Sec...

Case Number: 4009

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. B.D.SAINIA

Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 02/02/2007 in Complaint No. 95/1998 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA11665/1, SAT NAGAR, KAROL BAGH NEW DELHI - 110005...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DELHI DE...

Case Number: 183

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2013

NCDRC

M/S. MAHADEV ASSOCIATES, MEERUT V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 124 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/05/2012 in Complaint No. 61/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN,MEERUT2. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTH...

Case Number: 124

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2013

NCDRC

MADHUKAR OMKAR TARHALE V/S MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. C.M. SHROFF & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 239 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/07/2012 in Appeal No. 6/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/438/2013,IA/439/20131. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYGRIHA NIRMAN BHAW...

Case Number: 239

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.