company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

BHUPENDER SHARMA V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...

Case Number: 4498

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2013

NCDRC

UPENDRA PAL GUPTA V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO

Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...

Case Number: 4523

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2013

NCDRC

PUNEET GUPTA V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2251 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 07/03/2011 in Appeal No. 973/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSon of Rabinder Parshad Gupta, R/o 305-WE Alim Mo...

Case Number: 2251

|

Date of Filing: 01-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-05-2013

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PONNAMMA K.K.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S.S. NAIR

Respondant Advocate MR. S.A. SYED

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2470 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 17/03/2008 in Appeal No. 2934/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PONNAMMA K.K.K.G.M.U. Hospital Chowk,LucknowUttar Pradesh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 2470

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 20-05-2013

NCDRC

VEENA TAMTA BHATIA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 109 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 26/09/2008 in Complaint No. 219/2000 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTharogh Its Director, H-II Vikas Sadan -I.N.I New Delhi Delhi ..............

Case Number: 109

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2013

NCDRC

PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S THE DANGRA PIRAT COOP

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ANIL AMRIT & ASSO.

Respondant Advocate MR. ATUL NANDA, ADVOCATE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 136 OF 20031. THE DANGRA PIRAT COOP4552-B , SECTOR -70 SAS NAGAR (MOHALI)ROPARPUNJAB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through Its Chief Administrator, Sector 17,Chandigar...

Case Number: 136

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2003

|

Date of Upload: 10-05-2013

NCDRC

VAS DEV V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 22/08/2008 in Complaint No. 55/2000 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chiarman , Vikas Sadan ,New DelhiDelhi ...........Appellan...

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2013

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. B.D.SAINIA

Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 203 OF 2013 IN FA/183/20071. ASHOK KUMAR SAINIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. V...

Case Number: 203

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S DHARAMPAL

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ASHISH UPADHYAY & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4171 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Appeal No. 262/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DHARAMPALS/o Late Shri Ram Lal, R/o BG-5/70B, Paschim ViharNEW DELHI - 110063DELHI...........Pe...

Case Number: 4171

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2013

NCDRC

SURESH CHAND GUPTA V/S AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2255 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 26/10/2007 in Appeal No. 993/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Jaipur House AgraUttar Pradesh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 2255

|

Date of Filing: 23-05-2008

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.