Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3791 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 196/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Vice Chairman, Vikas Sadan, I.N.A. Market,New Delhi-110023Delh...
Case Number: 3791
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4424
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4425
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4426
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4427
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4428
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4429
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4495
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4496
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4424 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 297/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)1. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Chief Executive Of...
Case Number: 4497
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.