Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate BALDEV SINGH ,CLERK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.Complaint case no.:404 of 2022Date of Institution:03.11.2022Date of decision:01.02.2024Mukesh Jain aged about 47 years son of Sh. Ramesh Raj Jain,Reena Jain aged about 45 years Wife of Sh. Mukesh Jain,Both Residen...
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2024
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Arvind Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 911
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2024
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Duggal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/567/2020Date of Institution:02/12/2020Date of Decision:01/02/2024A.P. Duggal s/o Late Dharam Paul Duggal resident of Flat No.C-42, Sector 48-B, IInd Floor, Chandigarh.… ComplainantV ...
Case Number: 567
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2020
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2024
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUSHA NAGARAJAN
Respondant Advocate MR. ARJUN GROVER, ADITYA GROVER & POOJA R. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 17/06/2020 in Complaint No. 1022/2018 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, PUDA BHAWAN, SECTOR-62,SAS NA...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2021
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2024
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2317 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 30/08/2022 in Appeal No. A/1029/2014 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN BEHIND INA MARKET SOUTH EASTDELHI...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 2317
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2023
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2024
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vishal Verma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 733
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2024
Development Authority Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Naresh Kumar
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSIONGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/703/2017( Date of Filing : 26 Dec 2017 )1. Prem Bihari Baghel46,Lohiya Nagar.GhaziabadUttar Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Greater Noida Industrial Deve...
Case Number: 703
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2024
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PIYALI MUKHERJEE
Respondant Advocate
ASANSOL CIRCUIT BENCHofWEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKSTP COMMUNITY HALL , DAKSHIN DHADKAASANSOL, PASCHIM BURDWAN - 713302Interlocutory Application No. IA/5/2024( Date of Filing : 11 Jan 2024 )InExecution Application No. EA/10/20231. MOUSUMI DEYSHATABDI ...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2024
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2024
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL,SWETA RANI, SAMARTH AGARWAL & RITIKA KHANNA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2808 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 04/04/2016 in Appeal No. 2129/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG,LUCKNOWUT...
Case Number: 2808
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2024
Development Authority Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI
Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 342 OF 20171. ASHISH SHUKLA & 4 ORS.C-71, SECTOR-49.NOIDAU.P.-2013012. MS. RADHIKA SHUKLA.C-71, SECTOR-49.NOIDAU.P.-2013013. MR. GAURANG SANGHVI5 GUJRAT VIHAR, VIKAS MARG.DELHI-1100924. MS. KSHAMA SANGHVI5...
Case Number: 342
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2024
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.