Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SIDHARTH BAWA
Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2175 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/11/2011 in Appeal No. 2179/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMAS/o Shri Maniram Sharma, R/o 22 Lajpat kunj , Near B.R CollegeA...
Case Number: 2175
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTHOSH KRISHNAN, SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2013 IN RP/4138/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GURBANT SINGH & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. ...
Case Number: 262
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 263 OF 2013 IN RP/4424/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MANOHAR LAL THAKUR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. ...
Case Number: 263
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 264 OF 2013 IN RP/4426/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DR. D.R. BANYAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MAL...
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 265 OF 2013 IN RP/4427/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. ONKAR SINGH CHUGH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. M...
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 266 OF 2013 IN RP/4428/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. VIRENDER SINGH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALI...
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MS. SONAM ANAND & MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2013 IN RP/4141/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. JATINDER VAIDYA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK...
Case Number: 268
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 269 OF 2013 IN RP/4496/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KULDEEP SINGH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN & MS. SONAM ANAND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 270 OF 2013 IN RP/4498/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHUPENDER SHARMA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MA...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNAV PATNAIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1663 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 31/12/2012 in Appeal No. 685/2002 of the State Commission Orissa) WITH IA/2810/20131. BADRUN NISAR/O FLAT NO.MIG-10 BLOCK NO-2, NALA ROAD, POST ROURKELA-1 P.S PLAN...
Case Number: 1663
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.