Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
RAKESH GUPTA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 524 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/09/2007 in Appeal No. 465/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYBipin Khand, Naveen Bhawan, Gomti nagarLucknowU.P...........P...
Case Number: 524
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2013
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S RAMA NAND DHAKA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1569 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/04/2013 in Appeal No. 153/2008 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/2738/20131. RAMA NAND DHAKAS/O SHREE CHAND, R/O VILLAGE SERULI, P.O JAKHULISONEPATHARYAN...
Case Number: 1569
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2013
JAGDISH SARAN SHIRIVASTAVA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/01/2012 in Appeal No. 1296/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNaveen Bhawan, Bipin Khand, Gomti NagarLucknowU.P.............
Case Number: 2224
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2013
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Sumit Kumar
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/3161. Sumit Kumar son of Om Parkash son of Jiva Ram r/o H.No.B-8/235, Mall Godam road, Maur mandiBathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bathinda Development AuthorityBhagu road, Bathinda through its Administroator2. Estate officer,BDABhagu road, Bathin...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Om Parkash
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/3181. Om Parkash sonof Sh.Jiva Ram r/o H.No.B-8/235.Mall Godam road, Maur mandiBathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bathinda Development AuthorityBhagu road, Bathinda through its Administrator2. Estate OfficerBathinda Development Authority Bhagu road...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DR. ASHA SRIVASTAVA V/S GORAKHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANUPAM MISHRA
Respondant Advocate M/S. R.R & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4790 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/04/2011 in Appeal No. 2037/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4489/20131. GORAKHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS............Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 4790
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT.SUSMA RATHI
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 267
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR.
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ISHAAN MADAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/12/2012 in Complaint No. 193/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR.R/O. 30, POCKET-I, JASOLA, NEW DELHI-1100252. RASHMI JIN R/O. 30, POCKET-I, JA...
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
SHAFIQ AHMED V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED
Respondant Advocate M/S. NOO UI ISLAM & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2071 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1924/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secratary, 6 Jagdish Chand Bose Marg,LucknowU.P...
Case Number: 2071
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2013
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S RAJINDER KUMAR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SUSHILA THAKRAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4012 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/07/2012 in Appeal No. 367/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJINDER KUMARSH. KRISHAN CHAND, R/O HOUSE NO.462, SECTOR 13, HUDA,KARNAL HARYANA...........Pet...
Case Number: 4012
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.