Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3363 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/01/2012 in Appeal No. 704/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/5981/2013,IA/5982/2013,IA/5983/20131. ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT...
Case Number: 3363
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2013
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. YATISH MOHAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/01/2012 in Complaint No. 25/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/2773/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Present, Ghaziabad Develop...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2013
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV
Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 454 OF 2013 IN RP/4554/20101. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUSHILA GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN...
Case Number: 454
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2013
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SIDHARTH BAWA
Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 561 OF 2013 IN RP/2175/20121. DR. SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESI...
Case Number: 561
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2013
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADEEP MISRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2018 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/02/2011 in Appeal No. 499/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. VICE CHAIRMAN, KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.-KanpurU.P2. The Joint Secretary (Sales...
Case Number: 2018
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GIRISH ANANTHAMURTHY
Respondant Advocate MR. SARAN DEV SINGH THAKUR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2482 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1260/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. S. V. HARIS/o Late R. Srinivasan, C/o 1510, LakshmiknthnagarMysore - 17Karnataka...........P...
Case Number: 2482
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4339 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/08/2012 in Appeal No. 691/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Director, Vikas Sadan I.N.A NEW DELHi - 110023...........P...
Case Number: 4339
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2013 IN RP/3971/20121. LAXMI NARAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PR...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2013
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/03/2013 in Appeal No. 131/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)1. BALBIR SINGHS/O SH.RANJIT SINGH, R/O H.NO 5471/3 MODERN HOUSING, COMPLEX, MANI MAJRACHANDIGARH -...
Case Number: 2940
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.