Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASEEM MEHROTRA
Respondant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4749 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 16/04/2008 in Appeal No. 1887/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. RAM NIVAS GUPTAS/o R.L. Gupta, Resident of G-395 Kamla Nagar, New AgraAgraUttar Prad...
Case Number: 4749
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2013
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1546/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ESTATE OFFICER, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSCO No-41 Ladowali RoadJalandharPunjab2. Punj...
Case Number: 3382
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LE-AMBIENCE LEGAL SOLUTIONS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3494 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/07/2012 in Appeal No. 858/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/6214/20131. JITENDER PAL SIHAGS/O SH.S.R SIHAG, R/O H.NO-845,SECTOR- 8PABCHKULAHARYANA.....
Case Number: 3494
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2013
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJESH CHADHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2225 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/11/2011 in Appeal No. 175/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNaveen Bhawan, Bhipin Khand, Gomti NagarLucknowU.P.............
Case Number: 2225
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/03/2013 in Complaint No. 49/2003 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/2995/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS SADAN, I.N.A, NEW DELH...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 386 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/03/2013 in Complaint No. 49/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. PRAMOD PAL SINGHC-66, Malviya Nagar, New DelhiSouth DelhiNew Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VIC...
Case Number: 386
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 09/05/2008 in Complaint No. C-311/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MS. IQBAL KAURC-66, Malviya Nagar,New Delhi - 110 017Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VICE -CH...
Case Number: 298
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 09/05/2008 in Complaint No. C-311/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MS. IQBAL KAURC-66, Malviya Nagar,New Delhi - 110 017Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VICE -CH...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.